<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Digital Cameras New</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com</link>
	<description>Digital Cameras New</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 18:10:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon digital camera and other non canon lens? by Canon g12 review</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/canon-digital-camera-and-other-non-canon-lens/comment-page-1#comment-1740</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon g12 review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 18:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/canon-digital-camera-and-other-non-canon-lens#comment-1740</guid>
		<description>Canon&#039;s 4342B001 &lt;a href=&quot;http://canog12review.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Canon g12 review&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; 10MP Compact Digital Camera is ready to impress the advanced amateurs who have always celebrated the G Series. The G12 is still loaded with powerful technologies that has made the G Series cameras so renowned, like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://canog12review.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Canon g12 review&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; HS SYSTEM, 2.8-inch Vari-angle Pure Color System LCD, and RAW JPEG image modes. Now, this flagship camera paves the way with these new upgrades like 720p HD Video with stereo sound to get crystal clear footage, multiple aspect ratios, High Dynamic Range, &lt;a href=&quot;http://canog12review.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Canon g12 review&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Electronic Level, Tracking AF, a Front Dial and much more to give you even more creative control than before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon&#8217;s 4342B001 <a href="http://canog12review.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"><b>Canon g12 review</b></a> 10MP Compact Digital Camera is ready to impress the advanced amateurs who have always celebrated the G Series. The G12 is still loaded with powerful technologies that has made the G Series cameras so renowned, like the <a href="http://canog12review.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"><b>Canon g12 review</b></a> HS SYSTEM, 2.8-inch Vari-angle Pure Color System LCD, and RAW JPEG image modes. Now, this flagship camera paves the way with these new upgrades like 720p HD Video with stereo sound to get crystal clear footage, multiple aspect ratios, High Dynamic Range, <a href="http://canog12review.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"><b>Canon g12 review</b></a>Electronic Level, Tracking AF, a Front Dial and much more to give you even more creative control than before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q&amp;A: accesories for canon digital camera which makes me look like a pro? by S</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/qa-accesories-for-canon-digital-camera-which-makes-me-look-like-a-pro/comment-page-1#comment-1658</link>
		<dc:creator>S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 10:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/qa-accesories-for-canon-digital-camera-which-makes-me-look-like-a-pro#comment-1658</guid>
		<description>Actually, your own photography skills will make your pictures look &quot;pro and beautiful&quot;. So just focus on improving your photography skills. Even with a point-and-shoot camera, a person can take some very good pictures. Play around with the manual settings on your camera until you discover what works best for taking pictures under certain conditions. And read about things pertaining to photography, such as aperture, shutter speed, ISO speed, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, your own photography skills will make your pictures look &#8220;pro and beautiful&#8221;. So just focus on improving your photography skills. Even with a point-and-shoot camera, a person can take some very good pictures. Play around with the manual settings on your camera until you discover what works best for taking pictures under certain conditions. And read about things pertaining to photography, such as aperture, shutter speed, ISO speed, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon digital camera and other non canon lens? by electrosmack1</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/canon-digital-camera-and-other-non-canon-lens/comment-page-1#comment-1630</link>
		<dc:creator>electrosmack1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 12:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/canon-digital-camera-and-other-non-canon-lens#comment-1630</guid>
		<description>Some lenses to consider are those from Sigma, Tamron, and Tokina. On average, each lens does not do as well as their Canon or Nikon counterparts, but still get the job done. If you want quality, get Canon lenses. If you want a cheap alternative, go to the third party brands.

As for specifics, I use a Tamron 70-300mm f4-5.6 at the moment, but am going to upgrade to a 70-200mm VR once I save up enough money. The Tamron is good for the money, but slow to focus. I hear this also plagues the type with the built in motor.

The type of lens you want depends on the type of shooting you&#039;re going to do. If you shoot landscapes, look into a wide angle lens, such as the Sigma 10-20mm or Tamron 17-50mm. For telephoto zoom, the 70-200mm f2.8 Tamron would be a good option. I don&#039;t care too much for the Sigma, because there are issues with the outer coating. For portrait work, I&#039;ve heard good things about the Tamron 90mm macro, or the Sigma 70mm macro. I have not used Tonkina, but some people say they are good, while others do not. I guess the same goes for Sigma, but not so much with Tamron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some lenses to consider are those from Sigma, Tamron, and Tokina. On average, each lens does not do as well as their Canon or Nikon counterparts, but still get the job done. If you want quality, get Canon lenses. If you want a cheap alternative, go to the third party brands.</p>
<p>As for specifics, I use a Tamron 70-300mm f4-5.6 at the moment, but am going to upgrade to a 70-200mm VR once I save up enough money. The Tamron is good for the money, but slow to focus. I hear this also plagues the type with the built in motor.</p>
<p>The type of lens you want depends on the type of shooting you&#8217;re going to do. If you shoot landscapes, look into a wide angle lens, such as the Sigma 10-20mm or Tamron 17-50mm. For telephoto zoom, the 70-200mm f2.8 Tamron would be a good option. I don&#8217;t care too much for the Sigma, because there are issues with the outer coating. For portrait work, I&#8217;ve heard good things about the Tamron 90mm macro, or the Sigma 70mm macro. I have not used Tonkina, but some people say they are good, while others do not. I guess the same goes for Sigma, but not so much with Tamron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon digital camera and other non canon lens? by fhotoace</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/canon-digital-camera-and-other-non-canon-lens/comment-page-1#comment-1629</link>
		<dc:creator>fhotoace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 11:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/canon-digital-camera-and-other-non-canon-lens#comment-1629</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t do it ... buy used Canon&#039;s if you have to but you will be unhappy in a couple decades with the non-Canon lenses.

If you really HAVE to buy a non-Canon lens ... look at the Tokina line .. they are the ones who make some of the Pentax lenses as well as the Hoya filters</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t do it &#8230; buy used Canon&#8217;s if you have to but you will be unhappy in a couple decades with the non-Canon lenses.</p>
<p>If you really HAVE to buy a non-Canon lens &#8230; look at the Tokina line .. they are the ones who make some of the Pentax lenses as well as the Hoya filters</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is samsung digital camera a good buy? Meaning the quality and durabilty? by John M</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/is-samsung-digital-camera-a-good-buy-meaning-the-quality-and-durabilty/comment-page-1#comment-1615</link>
		<dc:creator>John M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/is-samsung-digital-camera-a-good-buy-meaning-the-quality-and-durabilty#comment-1615</guid>
		<description>groppetti is right, a canon or a nikon.  I may cost a bit more for the canon or nikon but the quality makes it worth it.  The Canon A1000 is on sale for 159.99.  not bad but is it worth it yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>groppetti is right, a canon or a nikon.  I may cost a bit more for the canon or nikon but the quality makes it worth it.  The Canon A1000 is on sale for 159.99.  not bad but is it worth it yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is samsung digital camera a good buy? Meaning the quality and durabilty? by MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/is-samsung-digital-camera-a-good-buy-meaning-the-quality-and-durabilty/comment-page-1#comment-1614</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/is-samsung-digital-camera-a-good-buy-meaning-the-quality-and-durabilty#comment-1614</guid>
		<description>Cant fault Samsung. We have one on our boat and it regularly has accidents and gets damp put puts up with our abuse well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cant fault Samsung. We have one on our boat and it regularly has accidents and gets damp put puts up with our abuse well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is samsung digital camera a good buy? Meaning the quality and durabilty? by Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/is-samsung-digital-camera-a-good-buy-meaning-the-quality-and-durabilty/comment-page-1#comment-1613</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/is-samsung-digital-camera-a-good-buy-meaning-the-quality-and-durabilty#comment-1613</guid>
		<description>canon always does the job,and the image quality is extraordinary,you won&#039;t regret.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>canon always does the job,and the image quality is extraordinary,you won&#8217;t regret.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is samsung digital camera a good buy? Meaning the quality and durabilty? by ☆kemi☆</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/is-samsung-digital-camera-a-good-buy-meaning-the-quality-and-durabilty/comment-page-1#comment-1612</link>
		<dc:creator>☆kemi☆</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/is-samsung-digital-camera-a-good-buy-meaning-the-quality-and-durabilty#comment-1612</guid>
		<description>For picture quality i recommend canon because you get really clear colours. However Panasonic are now really god a digital cameras. The new lumix range offers cameras which are small, compact and neat yet they still have amazing features including intelligent  auto mode and image stablizer as well as face detection. they start from around £139 i think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For picture quality i recommend canon because you get really clear colours. However Panasonic are now really god a digital cameras. The new lumix range offers cameras which are small, compact and neat yet they still have amazing features including intelligent  auto mode and image stablizer as well as face detection. they start from around £139 i think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is samsung digital camera a good buy? Meaning the quality and durabilty? by groppetti_automotive_family</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/is-samsung-digital-camera-a-good-buy-meaning-the-quality-and-durabilty/comment-page-1#comment-1611</link>
		<dc:creator>groppetti_automotive_family</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/is-samsung-digital-camera-a-good-buy-meaning-the-quality-and-durabilty#comment-1611</guid>
		<description>no get a Nikon or a Canon they both take the best pictures of all the brands of digital camera&#039;s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no get a Nikon or a Canon they both take the best pictures of all the brands of digital camera&#8217;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is samsung digital camera a good buy? Meaning the quality and durabilty? by sloanewhitley</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/is-samsung-digital-camera-a-good-buy-meaning-the-quality-and-durabilty/comment-page-1#comment-1610</link>
		<dc:creator>sloanewhitley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/is-samsung-digital-camera-a-good-buy-meaning-the-quality-and-durabilty#comment-1610</guid>
		<description>Samsung is OK...not the best but for your dollar&#039;s worth, get the Kodak Easy Share...it does a lot. I have one and am still amazed at all the things it can do. Try Target and Best Buy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samsung is OK&#8230;not the best but for your dollar&#8217;s worth, get the Kodak Easy Share&#8230;it does a lot. I have one and am still amazed at all the things it can do. Try Target and Best Buy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anyone have this problem with Polaroid Digital Camera? by VINTAGE MUSIC</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/anyone-have-this-problem-with-polaroid-digital-camera/comment-page-1#comment-1608</link>
		<dc:creator>VINTAGE MUSIC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 12:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/anyone-have-this-problem-with-polaroid-digital-camera#comment-1608</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have that problem. You could not give me a Polaroid camera for free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have that problem. You could not give me a Polaroid camera for free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anyone have this problem with Polaroid Digital Camera? by Elvis</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/anyone-have-this-problem-with-polaroid-digital-camera/comment-page-1#comment-1607</link>
		<dc:creator>Elvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 11:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/anyone-have-this-problem-with-polaroid-digital-camera#comment-1607</guid>
		<description>it needs repaired by a service center</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it needs repaired by a service center</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is the best SLR digital camera to buy? by Spipa P</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/what-is-the-best-slr-digital-camera-to-buy/comment-page-1#comment-1605</link>
		<dc:creator>Spipa P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 18:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/what-is-the-best-slr-digital-camera-to-buy#comment-1605</guid>
		<description>I would consider Canon EOS Rebel T2i 18 MP CMOS APS-C Digital SLR Camera 
* 18.0-megapixel CMOS (APS-C) sensor;
* DIGIC 4 image processor for high image quality and speed
* ISO 100-6400 (expandable to 12800) for shooting from bright to dim light; 
* enhanced 63-zone, Dual-layer metering system
* Improved EOS Movie mode with manual exposure control and expanded recording 1920 x 1080 (Full HD)
* Wide 3.0-inch Clear View LCD monitor; 
* Dedicated Live View/Movie shooting button
* New compatibility with SDXC memory cards,
* Plus new menu status indicator for Eye-Fi support</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would consider Canon EOS Rebel T2i 18 MP CMOS APS-C Digital SLR Camera<br />
* 18.0-megapixel CMOS (APS-C) sensor;<br />
* DIGIC 4 image processor for high image quality and speed<br />
* ISO 100-6400 (expandable to 12800) for shooting from bright to dim light;<br />
* enhanced 63-zone, Dual-layer metering system<br />
* Improved EOS Movie mode with manual exposure control and expanded recording 1920 x 1080 (Full HD)<br />
* Wide 3.0-inch Clear View LCD monitor;<br />
* Dedicated Live View/Movie shooting button<br />
* New compatibility with SDXC memory cards,<br />
* Plus new menu status indicator for Eye-Fi support</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is the best SLR digital camera to buy? by DigitalPhotography</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/what-is-the-best-slr-digital-camera-to-buy/comment-page-1#comment-1604</link>
		<dc:creator>DigitalPhotography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 18:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/what-is-the-best-slr-digital-camera-to-buy#comment-1604</guid>
		<description>Hey,

For around $ 500, I recommend Canon EOS XS and Nikon D3000. However, the D3000 has no Live View and no AF motor, so not all lenses will auto focus.

Here&#039;s a post called &#039;Buying a DSLR, what&#039;s important, megapixels, features, brand, price, quality and which one to buy - http://www.the-dslr-photographer.com/2009/03/which-dslr-to-buy.html

Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p>For around $ 500, I recommend Canon EOS XS and Nikon D3000. However, the D3000 has no Live View and no AF motor, so not all lenses will auto focus.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a post called &#8216;Buying a DSLR, what&#8217;s important, megapixels, features, brand, price, quality and which one to buy &#8211; <a href="http://www.the-dslr-photographer.com/2009/03/which-dslr-to-buy.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.the-dslr-photographer.com/2009/03/which-dslr-to-buy.html</a></p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is the best SLR digital camera to buy? by H</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/what-is-the-best-slr-digital-camera-to-buy/comment-page-1#comment-1603</link>
		<dc:creator>H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 17:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/what-is-the-best-slr-digital-camera-to-buy#comment-1603</guid>
		<description>Any Canon Rebel series would do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any Canon Rebel series would do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on which is camera is better? a slr digital camera or a non digital slr camera? by gryphon1911</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/which-is-camera-is-better-a-slr-digital-camera-or-a-non-digital-slr-camera/comment-page-1#comment-1578</link>
		<dc:creator>gryphon1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/which-is-camera-is-better-a-slr-digital-camera-or-a-non-digital-slr-camera#comment-1578</guid>
		<description>While having an SLR/DSLR always seems like the best way to go in a lot of peoples minds, it may not be for you.

Are you planning on doing more than snaps shots?   If not, then get a nice point and shoot camera.  

If you have doubts on any kind of photography career or future, then get a point and shoot.

A professional photographer gerts great results because of their knowledge and experience, not from the camera they use.  Just having an SLR or DSLR will not make your images any better than mine, Ansel Adams, or the kid down the street.

Space is not a consideration even for film as you can have them developed at a pro lab, if need be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While having an SLR/DSLR always seems like the best way to go in a lot of peoples minds, it may not be for you.</p>
<p>Are you planning on doing more than snaps shots?   If not, then get a nice point and shoot camera.  </p>
<p>If you have doubts on any kind of photography career or future, then get a point and shoot.</p>
<p>A professional photographer gerts great results because of their knowledge and experience, not from the camera they use.  Just having an SLR or DSLR will not make your images any better than mine, Ansel Adams, or the kid down the street.</p>
<p>Space is not a consideration even for film as you can have them developed at a pro lab, if need be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on which is camera is better? a slr digital camera or a non digital slr camera? by Mere_Mortal</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/which-is-camera-is-better-a-slr-digital-camera-or-a-non-digital-slr-camera/comment-page-1#comment-1577</link>
		<dc:creator>Mere_Mortal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/which-is-camera-is-better-a-slr-digital-camera-or-a-non-digital-slr-camera#comment-1577</guid>
		<description>Neither is better. I use both. 

A dSLR for Color images. Canon Elan 7e with XP2 for b&amp;w. Process only and then scan. XP2 is dye based and it scans magnificently. It looks better than any desaturated file that I have ever seen.

I suggest that if you do decide to go with a digital P&amp;S make sure it has a RAW capture mode.( I personally would never recommend a digital P&amp;S to any real student of photography, that 110 sized sensor produces a harsh, truncated tonal range. Yech!)

I do not believe color 35mm film is that big of a deal anymore. I usually get better results with my APS dSLR than 35mm film.

(However, if I am doing landscape or anything where I need magnificent detail I will not shoot anything smaller than 6x7cm film. I prefer 8x10 for landscape. But that is a different story)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neither is better. I use both. </p>
<p>A dSLR for Color images. Canon Elan 7e with XP2 for b&#038;w. Process only and then scan. XP2 is dye based and it scans magnificently. It looks better than any desaturated file that I have ever seen.</p>
<p>I suggest that if you do decide to go with a digital P&#038;S make sure it has a RAW capture mode.( I personally would never recommend a digital P&#038;S to any real student of photography, that 110 sized sensor produces a harsh, truncated tonal range. Yech!)</p>
<p>I do not believe color 35mm film is that big of a deal anymore. I usually get better results with my APS dSLR than 35mm film.</p>
<p>(However, if I am doing landscape or anything where I need magnificent detail I will not shoot anything smaller than 6x7cm film. I prefer 8&#215;10 for landscape. But that is a different story)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on which is camera is better? a slr digital camera or a non digital slr camera? by perki88</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/which-is-camera-is-better-a-slr-digital-camera-or-a-non-digital-slr-camera/comment-page-1#comment-1576</link>
		<dc:creator>perki88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/which-is-camera-is-better-a-slr-digital-camera-or-a-non-digital-slr-camera#comment-1576</guid>
		<description>Buy a used DSLR from a reputable store. I have bought many items from Cameta Camera, since days of my buying film cameras and they back up what they sell...there&#039;s a nice Rebel kit here for  around $ 400.
http://secure.cameta.com/index.cfm?fa=display.showused&amp;page=2
My other choice would be a new Canon G9...not a DSLR but harder to outgrow than most point and shoots. Shoots RAW and has a hot shoe.BUT, it would cost more than this used camera.

As far as a film camera, the joy of film is in the darkroom and if you are not gong to process, you are better off with digital.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buy a used DSLR from a reputable store. I have bought many items from Cameta Camera, since days of my buying film cameras and they back up what they sell&#8230;there&#8217;s a nice Rebel kit here for  around $ 400.<br />
<a href="http://secure.cameta.com/index.cfm?fa=display.showused&#038;page=2" rel="nofollow">http://secure.cameta.com/index.cfm?fa=display.showused&#038;page=2</a><br />
My other choice would be a new Canon G9&#8230;not a DSLR but harder to outgrow than most point and shoots. Shoots RAW and has a hot shoe.BUT, it would cost more than this used camera.</p>
<p>As far as a film camera, the joy of film is in the darkroom and if you are not gong to process, you are better off with digital.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on which is camera is better? a slr digital camera or a non digital slr camera? by Bill P</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/which-is-camera-is-better-a-slr-digital-camera-or-a-non-digital-slr-camera/comment-page-1#comment-1575</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/which-is-camera-is-better-a-slr-digital-camera-or-a-non-digital-slr-camera#comment-1575</guid>
		<description>I will stir the pot a different way.  Although I have digitals, I think the place to start is with film cameras.  I would not even think of doing the developing in my home, so space is not a problem.  You can get film developed at Target or Walmart for about 7$ $  for a 24 exposure roll, and that includes the prints.  

Most people who are printing their digital pictures at home do not consider all of the costs involved and the fragility of the picture that is the result.  Most ink jet printers do not make a long lasting print, Target does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will stir the pot a different way.  Although I have digitals, I think the place to start is with film cameras.  I would not even think of doing the developing in my home, so space is not a problem.  You can get film developed at Target or Walmart for about 7$ $  for a 24 exposure roll, and that includes the prints.  </p>
<p>Most people who are printing their digital pictures at home do not consider all of the costs involved and the fragility of the picture that is the result.  Most ink jet printers do not make a long lasting print, Target does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on which is camera is better? a slr digital camera or a non digital slr camera? by Piano Man</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/which-is-camera-is-better-a-slr-digital-camera-or-a-non-digital-slr-camera/comment-page-1#comment-1574</link>
		<dc:creator>Piano Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamerasnew.com/which-is-camera-is-better-a-slr-digital-camera-or-a-non-digital-slr-camera#comment-1574</guid>
		<description>Go digital for sure.  Most of the worlds top professional photographers mainly shoot digital.  That speaks for itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go digital for sure.  Most of the worlds top professional photographers mainly shoot digital.  That speaks for itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/28 queries in 0.035 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 546/554 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.digitalcamerasnew.com @ 2012-02-08 09:09:56 -->
